Comment on Claude Code is suddenly everywhere inside Microsoft
1984@lemmy.today 2 weeks agoMy girlfriend is forced to use only Copilot at her work, and its just completely useless. She frequently posts me failed tasks it couldnt do. :).
GitHub copilot within visual studio is not bad actually, if it doesn’t find anything to but typos then congrats your team is all competent senior developers…
It does cut down review time for juniors’ work, and it’s capable of implementing full features given the correct documentation and instructions. It’s a useful tool that assists and doesn’t replace competent developers.
For copilot in visual studio at least you can select between models it will use, depending on the org setup showing them.
They’re all objectively shit.
Even with Opus in the backend Copilot is so bad compared to Claude code
I don’t know, that is about all Mistral can do too.
That and python scipy is like a 50/50 for relevant code snippits.
It had never once output compilable embedded code, even when I have tried to directly lead it there.
Seems to be the worst Ai by far.
Which is weird because isn’t ChatGPT supposed to be one of the best (least shittiest)? Isn’t CoPilot rebranded ChatGPT?
The model (sonnet, opus, gpt) is the engine, the framework (copilot, Claude, codex) is the rest of the car
If you put a V8 Hemi in a shitbox, it’s still a shitbox.
No, gpt is much better. I dont know how it works behind the scenes but I think Copilot is what Microsoft built and gpt is what open ai built.
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
It’s only core competency is convincing idiot c-suites that they should force their org to use copilot