Like intelisence which has been doing it faster, more consistantly and offline since the mid 2000’s?
Comment on Claude Code is suddenly everywhere inside Microsoft
Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 hours ago
We got copilot reviewing our code at work
It mostly just finds typos and other things like that
Quite useless at anything else
MadPsyentist@lemmy.nz 13 hours ago
1984@lemmy.today 16 hours ago
My girlfriend is forced to use only Copilot at her work, and its just completely useless. She frequently posts me failed tasks it couldnt do. :).
3abas@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
GitHub copilot within visual studio is not bad actually, if it doesn’t find anything to but typos then congrats your team is all competent senior developers…
It does cut down review time for juniors’ work, and it’s capable of implementing full features given the correct documentation and instructions. It’s a useful tool that assists and doesn’t replace competent developers.
JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 5 hours ago
I don’t know, that is about all Mistral can do too.
That and python scipy is like a 50/50 for relevant code snippits.
It had never once output compilable embedded code, even when I have tried to directly lead it there.
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 13 hours ago
It’s only core competency is convincing idiot c-suites that they should force their org to use copilot
k0e3@lemmy.ca 9 hours ago
Which is weird because isn’t ChatGPT supposed to be one of the best (least shittiest)? Isn’t CoPilot rebranded ChatGPT?
1984@lemmy.today 4 hours ago
No, gpt is much better. I dont know how it works behind the scenes but I think Copilot is what Microsoft built and gpt is what open ai built.