That’s simply not how I read it at all. He’s referring to people taking excerpts from the code and running away with long conclusions and motives based in some cases on presuppositions and assuming bad intent.
It reads as being upset anyone would dare read it. Especially with replying to the person pointing it out they wouldn’t review anything they thought was intentional coded in a particular way.
Note this is completely separate from by stance after reading some of the code and stance of the level of it.
Skavau@piefed.social 2 days ago
Saying some are doing amateur speculation is not the same thing as saying anyone who has issues are “amateurs”.
goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 days ago
Except that is exactly how it reads.
ignore everyone else looking at the code because they’re amateurs as we’re the only professionals here
Skavau@piefed.social 2 days ago
That’s simply not how I read it at all. He’s referring to people taking excerpts from the code and running away with long conclusions and motives based in some cases on presuppositions and assuming bad intent.
goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 days ago
It reads as being upset anyone would dare read it. Especially with replying to the person pointing it out they wouldn’t review anything they thought was intentional coded in a particular way.
Note this is completely separate from by stance after reading some of the code and stance of the level of it.