Comment

Comment on

Hard agree. I tend to ignore posts that only provide a link and nothing else.

At the very least highlight something of the text in the post description that is worth reading to create a discussion, and then give us your two cents in the comments.

source

Sort:hotnew top

MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
Oh yeah, and the posts with just a youtube link and a title that doesn’t adequately describe it drive me nuts.

source
- veeesix@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
  On the other end of the spectrum are post descriptions that copy the entire article and you’re met with a giant wall of text. It’s about curation, folks!
  
  source
tpyo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago
I’ve noticed that trend, especially with high-volume posters

Some things are posted with substance and other times it’s just a link to a pic of a random artefact in a museum. Ok, it’s cool looking but is it significant? Not that that matters but if you’re going to post something at least include why. Other than “I hit random”

source