Comment on Federal judge again strikes down California law banning gun magazines of more than 10 rounds

• PizzaMan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  There is no and should not be a requirement to register to express a right that clearly states it shall not be infringed.

  And requiring registration does not infringe, as you are still permitted to own guns.

  showe a criminal with bad intentions who’s going to register his firearms he bought out of the back of a van. Especially a publicly searchable registry where home invaders could add that little step to planning out which homes they’re going to invade.

  These are strawman arguments.

  Stop it.

  Nope. Children are needlessly being killed over this stupid shit that should have been dealt with a century ago.

  source

  • dartanjinn@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Children are being killed over gun rights? Either you’re full of shit or you’re admitting children are being killed by the state for emotional reactions like yours.

    Saying criminals are not going to register their guns is not a strawman, it’s the absolute factual truth which you willingly refuse to accept.

    Do you need to register your right to speak in public? That wouldn’t be an infringement on your right to free speech, would it? Do you need to register your right to not speak to avoid self incrimination? No. Do you need to register your right to protection from unlawful search and seizure? Nope.

    You register for privileges, not rights. I don’t care if you don’t like it. In fact, the courts don’t care if you don’t like it. Just ask Michelle Grisham what people think of your bullshit.

    source

    • PizzaMan@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Children are being killed over gun rights?

      Yes. The lack of gun control is leading to shootings, accidental discharges, etc, which directly lead to the deaths of children.

      Either you’re full of shit or you’re admitting children are being killed by the state for emotional reactions like yours.

      The state is not doing that.

      Saying criminals are not going to register their guns is not a strawman, it’s the absolute factual truth which you willingly refuse to accept.

      I don’t think you understand how a strawman works.

      You were arguing against a position I do not hold. You can’t just make up some crap, argue against it, and then pretend that it’s a view I hold.

      Do you need to register your right to speak in public?

      So there is a fundamental misunderstanding you have here. The right to speak and the right to bear arms are fundamentally different rights. One is the right to an action, the other is a right to own something. One is not inherently dangerous, the other is. So pretending that the protections surrounding these rights can be applied the same is just silly. The right to speak does not carry anywhere near the same danger as a gun.

      On top of that, there are other things we have the right to own that are dangerous and therefore require registration, such as cars. We have the right to own cars, but we are still required to register them due to the dangers involved with them. Bicycles don’t require registration, and that’s because they aren’t dangerous, or at least not anywhere near as dangerous.

      You register for privileges, not rights. I don’t care if you don’t like it. In fact, the courts don’t care if you don’t like it. Just ask Michelle Grisham what people think of your bullshit.

      I really do not care what Girsham/pro-gun death people think.

      source

      • dartanjinn@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Lol driving is a privilege, not a right. All that rambling and you still can’t get it right.

        The 2nd is literally the only right that specifically states “shall not be infringed.” Yet here you are wanting it infringed because you’re scared.

        And you obviously don’t know who Michelle Grisham is. I’ll end my interaction there. Learn before you speak.

        source

        • -> View More Comments