Comment on Is lemmy.ml turn into authoritarian?
wit@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I think this is bad for Lemmy as a whole, as a community. People are doing to equate the “censorship” on lemmy.ml as censorship on Lemmy as a platform. That is just NOT THE CASE. Please, whenever someone mentions lemmy.ml and its censorship or the likes, be fast to mention that that is a specific lemmy server and the beauty of lemmy is its decentralization. There are plenty of other servers.
I fear that this kind of thing drives people away from Lemmy, when it should not.
gelberhut@lemdro.id 1 year ago
Well, the situation is a bit more complex. Admins of this “specific Lemmy Server” are creators and main maintainers of the Lemmy project as such.
So, generalization you are afraid of makes some sense.
wit@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I have replied to someone else further down with my opinion on this topic. I think it also fits in a reply to you, so I will just copy paste it here:
gelberhut@lemdro.id 1 year ago
You have many good points here. Still, I have a feeling that Lemmy as a platform and as a software is still very coupled with its creators.
Yes, there are other contributors as well. But these guys currently own the official repo and make key decisions. And if you donate to Lemmy you pay a salary to these two guys (afaik, Lemmy is their full-time work these days).
So, for me, it is still rather complicated.
ToxicWaste@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I don’t see a problem about their work, just because of their political orientation. And frankly, neither should you.
They develop good software, which is open source and everyone can inspect it. There is nothing wrong about them getting paid for it. Not giving donations to them because of what they believe would be the same as an employer running you through a political evaluation before actually employing you.
Don’t get me wrong: there is nothing wrong about not donating (i did not). But not donating, solely because of some ideology a developer of open source Software has (which does not reflect in the code), seems quite stuck up to me.
iegod@lemm.ee 1 year ago
You actually have no guarantee that any given deployment doesn’t harvest and sell data. They probably don’t, but it’s not guaranteed.
phillaholic@lemm.ee 1 year ago
The data is public. It doesn’t matter.
HKayn@dormi.zone 1 year ago
Only if it’s actually having an effect on the Lemmy project.
From what I’ve seen, the Lemmy devs recognize that their opinions aren’t welcome everywhere, and that Lemmy should not have any biases.
Natanael@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
That might still have secondary effects such as in what kind of moderation features they develop and support
hypelightfly@kbin.social 1 year ago
Hint: the moderation tools they are choosing to develop are none.
They are intentionally refusing to develop any moderation tools despite current moderation tools not working and it being the biggest issue instance admins are facing.
Socsa@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
It also has the largest worldnews community, which bans you for discussing a literal war in Europe
goat@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
psssst… check out !worldnews@sh.itjust.works