Comment on LLMs are already doing fascists a favor by ensuring that anything that is reasonably eloquently formulated on social media is automatically suspected of having been written by LLMs.

sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• arcticx@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I would counter that by saying Twitter encouraged people to learn brevity and clarity when communicating their thoughts. LLMs on the other hand encourage a bloated verbosity that no one wants to read. It’s like Corporate Memphis but with words.

  source

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I would counter that no, no it did not.

    It just turned people into hypocrites, hypocrites with better marketability.

    Brevity? Maybe, kind of, if you count a barrage of snippets as brief.

    Clarity? … No. Because without a format that fully allows a nuanced but actually coherent and consistent position or explanation… it just makes you into a hypocrite.

    source
• other_cat@piefed.zip ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I remember when Twitter was juuust gaining popularity and someone explained what it was to me. I was really confused. “Why would I post to a platform with a character limit??” Like I couldn’t wrap my head around that self-imposed limitation.

  By the time I saw/heard people writing whole essays and breaking them into 20 posts I was just like.. why would you subject yourself to this? Blogs exist, go back to them.

  source