Considering Dan isn’t a bot and responds to comments in the forum, I suspect you have no clue what you’re talking about.
The sourced research he cites is also not AI generated.
Comment on Never-before-seen Linux malware is “far more advanced than typical”
tidderuuf@lemmy.world 1 month ago
With no indication that VoidLink is actively targeting machines, there’s no immediate action required by defenders, although they can obtain indicators of compromise from the Checkpoint blog post.
Don’t click on the article. It’s an AI regurgitated summary and internet rot site.
You’re welcome.
adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
solrize@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Ars technica is usually legit.
jjlinux@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
‘Usually’ being the operating word. It’s still a media Corp owned company part of Condé Nast, like Wired.
acosmichippo@lemmy.world 1 month ago
you’re AI on an internet rot site.
BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
Yeah! AI bad!
Give him the updoots for saying it!
Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
Did you just call Ars Technica an “internet rot site”?
Good way to make it obvious you don’t know what you’re talking about without saying you don’t know what you’re talking about.
tidderuuf@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Do I need to repeat myself or is your skull too thick? Try using those links in a year from now Ars is literally an Arse of the tech industry.
Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It might help if you actually said something rather than just trolling with below average bait (assuming you are trolling and not just intellectually battling a door stop for 3rd place)
Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Ok, noted. Troll identified and blocked.
tidderuuf@lemmy.world 1 month ago
“oh no someone said the truth but it hurts my feelings” blocked