Considering Dan isn’t a bot and responds to comments in the forum, I suspect you have no clue what you’re talking about.
The sourced research he cites is also not AI generated.
Comment on Never-before-seen Linux malware is “far more advanced than typical”
tidderuuf@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
With no indication that VoidLink is actively targeting machines, there’s no immediate action required by defenders, although they can obtain indicators of compromise from the Checkpoint blog post.
Don’t click on the article. It’s an AI regurgitated summary and internet rot site.
You’re welcome.
adespoton@lemmy.ca 5 hours ago
solrize@lemmy.ml 5 hours ago
Ars technica is usually legit.
acosmichippo@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
you’re AI on an internet rot site.
Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 hours ago
Did you just call Ars Technica an “internet rot site”?
Good way to make it obvious you don’t know what you’re talking about without saying you don’t know what you’re talking about.
tidderuuf@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
Do I need to repeat myself or is your skull too thick? Try using those links in a year from now Ars is literally an Arse of the tech industry.