Comment on Discord in discussions of going Public Trading, economics expert discusses how that might change things

adespoton@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

• sirboozebum@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  The real question is how do you enshittify a product that is already shit?

  source

  • Soup@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Since when is Discord shit? Oh no, an easy to use application with incredible sound quality! Ahhhh

    Anything annoying I can think of is stuff that makes a lot of sense considering said application is, for most people, 100% free.

    source

    • adespoton@lemmy.ca ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      The gamification, closed protocol and grey patterns make sense? It really doesn’t have to be that way.

      That said, up to this point, Discord at least appears to have made a good faith attempt at providing a useful service while also making a profit. I suspect we’re about to see the dial crank over into “turn a profit for the next quarterly report” territory.

      source

      • Soup@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        You don’t need to engage with the gamification thing. Closed protocol sure I guess, and also I’m sorry I don’t know what “grey partterns” are and am gunna assume that you’re not referring to the colour palette.

        But it’s a solid product that largely just works. I’m still worried, obviously, that certain voluntary things will become less voluntary and things will get much more frustrating as they search to go public.

        source
      • Auth@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Discord is technologically lightyears ahead of their competition. Its by far the smoothest large scale chat application out there. The only “dark pattern” is them pushing Nitro and you know what users should buy nitro not free to run a service at that scale.

        source