Comment on PieFed 1.4 is released - emoji, federated stackoverflow and AI content filters
Skavau@piefed.social 3 days agoThen why restrict this logic to “like/dislike” activities, and not extend to any type of activity?
Some communities are also, or can be set to local only. What other activities do you have in mind?
A mitigation is not a proper solution, even less so when it violates other principles in distributed systems.
So far as I can see, that’s up to the collective fediverse population. You done a poll on this?
The harm itself will be for the instance admin later on. Still, the larger point is this solution is a workaround that does not bring any meaningful benefit for others in the Fediverse.
It’s not supposed to in this context. It’s for an instance admin who wants to populate the content of their own instance. Although it could be beneficial if it’s an instance for others that is not personal in scope and is supposed to be a wide-use instance.
rglullis@communick.news 3 days ago
Any and all of them? What is so special about
as:likeandas:dislike? There is nothing on ActivityPub preventing users to create posts or announce activities for a different target audience.This is tyranny of the majority. If one person is out there saying “I don’t want to have the data I’ve posted on server A to be presented as if I posted on server B”, then this person will be right to complain if they see their requests being respected.
(And before someone comes up and points fingers at me saying that Fediverser was also copying user posts without their consent: it’s true that the bots were recreating the posts and comments, but they were publishing information on the Fediverse with “actor ids” from Reddit. There is a subtle, but important difference)
Anyway, can we move on from this conversation, please? I am not going to change your mind about it and I don’t want to re-hash past discussions. I’m also not particularly interested in any of the current server-centric Fediverse projects, so you will have a hard time convincing me that anything being done on PieFed is worthy of praise.
Skavau@piefed.social 3 days ago
Well we already have ‘tyranny of the majority’ here regarding a whole host of functions on the fediverse. On reddit voting is entirely private, mod-logs hidden and people now can even hide their posting history. I am sure a non-zero amount of people here object to that (I know some do). But there’s no support for changing that due to the belief prevalent across the fediverse that these being publicly accessible keep the fediverse honest.
Maybe one could have an opt-out toggle in users profiles for potential community migration. Ultimately, I’m in favour of (if this functionality ever actually exists to completely move a community) being widely known. People would join the fediverse knowing that there’s a possibility that the community they’re posting on could, down-the-line, move to another instance and thus ‘move’ their posts and comments within that community.
And I’m just replying to your points from a community perspective. You’re welcome to reply or not.
rglullis@communick.news 3 days ago
Go to Reddit with a bag of money, get the voting history of whoever you want… how is that for “private”?
If we are talking about building an “open” web, then it makes no sense to justify any design based on how the “closed” web works. The incentives are different, the use-cases are different and in the long run it will be detrimental to the open web if we keep trying to mask away the differences.
More than that, I think that the biggest mistake being done by current fediverse projects is that they keep trying to emulate the proprietary networks. Social media “platforms” are bad by its very nature and chasing this idea that we can “fix” them by making open source versions of them is a fool’s errand.
Snoopy@piefed.social 2 days ago
Well, the fediverse is already beyond proprietary platform :
- IA content is restricted
- moderation action is in the modlog and transparency
- there is not ads
- we have some collective created to make a media network suntainable for anyone accessible to everyone.
- piefed offer other mean to the binary voting system
The threadiverse is already beyond proprietary software than to those many people building the fediverse.
And why can’t we duplicate well loved proprietary platform ? We are following people needs and slowly try to create something different by listening to people feedback.
Lastly, please, i understand that you are passionate about it but i don’t want to see this kind of critizism for any software, whatever they are :
It’s rude toward peopke who invested so much effort and gave their time to build it. It is inconsiderate. You can write a critize but without insulting people and convey your though.
For example :
(Sorry, i’m bad at understand technical detail)
And why i insist telling you that ?
That’s the key are in argument, discussion : people will listen to your point.
Lastly, the hardest part is also to listen what the other side say about this. It’s very difficult to listen even for myself as part of piefed staff. It’s not black and white, there is lot shade of colors :)
Skavau@piefed.social 3 days ago
Sorry, I meant in the sense of privacy from the perspective of other users. Your voting history cannot be seen by other users on Reddit, and you can hide your comment history from them too. I think these are bad decisions, but at the same time some people on the fediverse have voiced support for them.
ademir@lemmy.eco.br 3 days ago
If Piefed continues to implement features without considering the ActivityPub protocol and other platforms, much as Mastodon has been criticized for, it will damage the very interoperability that makes the fediverse valuable.
Skavau@piefed.social 3 days ago
Has that happened yet?