Comment on GOG is Getting Acquired By Its Original Co- Founder: What It Means For You
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 1 day agoSo your issue is drm free games that are… still currently popular? Oh, the horror. We must shield this child from the passage of time, for they believe ‘things were better when’ and ‘I already took my pills!’
Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 1 day ago
The name of the site is Good Old Games. I have no problem with a separate marketplace for Non-DRM current games. I don't see a reason to give a large company money - especially in a world where eXoDOS and eXoWin9x exist.
tomalley8342@lemmy.world 1 day ago
They removed the explicit Good Old Games abbreviation back in 2012. It’s just GOG.com now.
TachyonTele@piefed.social 1 day ago
Did you know that the Ronald McDonald House isn’t just one single house?
How do you feel about that?
Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 1 day ago
Good, they can help more people.
TachyonTele@piefed.social 1 day ago
But it’s House. Not Houses.
Is this crime forgivable to von majesty of language?
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 1 day ago
So where are you getting your current (let’s say released in the last decade, just to be generous), legal, AA/AAA, drm-free games from?
The answer ‘nowhere’ means that you have no viable argument.
Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 1 day ago
I have no interest in A/AA/AAA games in the last decade or so. I also truly don't give a single crap about "legal". Copywrong should be fought and all information should be made free at all times. I mean, technically I play games that are current, like Luanti, OpenTTD, Battle for Wesnoth, Mindustry, and Endless Sky. So I'm not in the same sphere.
Hell, as I said above, in a world where eXo exists, GOG needs to do a lot more to justify financial investment.