Maybe. I mean, on the one hand, undeniably yes, while on the other hand, cats in particular are simply too numerous in most spaces, and dogs are even an entire species altered to the whims of humankind, so given that existing backstory, which is least morally repugnant, to entertain their dependency or to now suddenly leave them to their own devices?
Either way I am glad that you are someone who wrestles with moral choices. Whether we end up agreeing on the outcome of those or not, I think that caring beats uncaring anytime.
GreatWhite_Shark_EarthAndBeingsRightsPerson@piefed.social 3 weeks ago
If I understand your reply, which is shocking to me.
Morally Wrong!?!?!?!?
Is it morally right to let them suffered, to an horrible death, like would happen if the animal was a wild animal suffering for the same problem- killing the animal? starving to death as that animal’s own family/pack members take the food she can no longer consume? or killed for food, by the superior predator?
jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 weeks ago
You have completely misunderstood.
GreatWhite_Shark_EarthAndBeingsRightsPerson@piefed.social 2 weeks ago
Oh, okay, thank you, for clearing-up most it.
“choices that were made long prior that were totally unnecessary and were not made with that individual’s interests in mind.”
What choices? By whom?
Are you talking regiliously, a higher being?