Comment on [deleted]

natecox@programming.dev ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

• tidderuuf@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Welcome to modern astroturfing in the social media age.

  source
• mesamunefire@piefed.social ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  There is a build page on the github for the device.

  source

  • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    There’s no such link. Can’t even find one through Google

    source
  • batman0730@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Is there? Mind sharing the link?

    source

    • mesamunefire@piefed.social ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I’ll find it after Christmas. I got a fork a bit ago when looking at the 3d files.

      source

      • Fmstrat@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Those aren’t build logs. Those are “I took an open source software package and put commercial hardware around it.”

        Which is fine, since it’s MIT software (and why I push for GPL, personally). What’s not fine is calling his commercial product “open”.

        I would revise the post title regardless of what the author calls it, personally.

        source
• Fmstrat@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I posted this as a comment on the creator’s post. Will have to see if they respond.

  I see “open” in the title, but no git or Bill of Materials (BOM) links. Is this actually open? Or based on other’s open efforts?

  source