Comment on AI-generated code contains more bugs and errors than human output
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 22 hours agoyhea, and “everything is a nail if all you got is a hammer”.
there are some uses for that kind of AI, but very limiting. less robotic voice assisants, content moderation, data analysis, quantification of text. the closest thing to Generative use should be to improve auto complete and spell checking.
M0oP0o@mander.xyz 22 hours ago
I was wondering how they could make autocomplete worse, and now I know.
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
I’m theory, I can imagine an LLM fine tuned on whatever you type. which might be slightly better then the current ones.
emphasis on the might.
M0oP0o@mander.xyz 21 hours ago
Well right now I have autocorrect changing real words for jumbles of letters due to years of myself working with acronyms and autocomplete changing words like both to bitch, for to fuck, etc. due to systems changing less used words for more used words (making the issue worse).
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
on top of that, an LLM can check if the sentence makes sense.
like in the previous post, where I accidentally started with “I’m theory” because I use Swype typing and using an LLM to predict the following tokens for the keyboard to know what I likely trying to say.