Comment on Loops publishes their recommender algorithm
korendian@lemmy.zip 1 week agoAh yes, I’m sure once I understand how something irrelevant to this diagrams functionality works, I will then see why you’re right… I will take your refusal to simply define the thing you are critiquing and explain it a bit more as a concession that you’re actually full of shit.
okamiueru@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Wouldn’t want to be accused of using big words, now, would I?
korendian@lemmy.zip 1 week ago
Lol, just keep dodging the questions, mr expect senior dev. Really convincing me of your expertise. 💩
okamiueru@lemmy.world 1 week ago
You want me to explain the bloom filter? So that you can say “see, I told you it makes sense to use as a memory efficient guaranteed no false negative checks on if a user has seen a video before. Dumbass”.
Then I’d reply something like “yeah, I, know… The point isn’t whether or not bloom filters can make sense here… What’s being discussed is whether or not this was generated by a human or LLm… And even if someone was making a diagram, of a system, where bloom filters was used, for the case of checking if you’ve already seen a video… It would still be weird to present it in the way it is presented in the diagram, for a human, but not so weird for an LLM, if you consider how LLMs work by associated concepts, where a <creator filter> and <bloom filter> are linguistically more connected, and explain why they are used similarly in the diagram, even though the latter is hardly considered a filter by anyone who has used one”
Then, you’ll be all non sequitur and accuse me of some ad hominem like “you use big words on purpose to seem smart, but you are dumb”.
korendian@lemmy.zip 1 week ago
I have to give credit where credits due, I appreciate you fast forwarding the conversation. Where you start to lose me is where you say who gives a shit about what data structure you use. Is it not important to use efficient filtering algorithms so data is streamed quickly? Just because you would not think to present it that way does not mean another human would not. I’m not going to call you an ad hominem, I am just literally confused at what your point is, and why you can’t just acknowledge the work by humans that was clearly out into this.