Ah yes, I’m sure once I understand how something irrelevant to this diagrams functionality works, I will then see why you’re right… I will take your refusal to simply define the thing you are critiquing and explain it a bit more as a concession that you’re actually full of shit.
Comment on Loops publishes their recommender algorithm
okamiueru@lemmy.world 1 week agoYou still think that’s relevant? I think you also might want to read again what I’ve written, from the start. Also, since you’re already learning so much. Read about how LLMs and transformers work. Then maybe read what I wrote a couple more times to make sure. Fingers crossed you figure it out. I don’t like being a dick to people. But I genuinely had good intentions to begin with.
korendian@lemmy.zip 1 week ago
okamiueru@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Wouldn’t want to be accused of using big words, now, would I?
korendian@lemmy.zip 1 week ago
Lol, just keep dodging the questions, mr expect senior dev. Really convincing me of your expertise. 💩
okamiueru@lemmy.world 1 week ago
You want me to explain the bloom filter? So that you can say “see, I told you it makes sense to use as a memory efficient guaranteed no false negative checks on if a user has seen a video before. Dumbass”.
Then I’d reply something like “yeah, I, know… The point isn’t whether or not bloom filters can make sense here… What’s being discussed is whether or not this was generated by a human or LLm… And even if someone was making a diagram, of a system, where bloom filters was used, for the case of checking if you’ve already seen a video… It would still be weird to present it in the way it is presented in the diagram, for a human, but not so weird for an LLM, if you consider how LLMs work by associated concepts, where a <creator filter> and <bloom filter> are linguistically more connected, and explain why they are used similarly in the diagram, even though the latter is hardly considered a filter by anyone who has used one”
Then, you’ll be all non sequitur and accuse me of some ad hominem like “you use big words on purpose to seem smart, but you are dumb”.
korendian@lemmy.zip 1 week ago
All I am literally asking is “why doesn’t this make sense”, and your response is “well you see, I’m an expert, so trust me bro”. Fuck off.
okamiueru@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Nah. You mistook my “these are the parts that really don’t make sense for a human to make”, with “i don’t understand the subject, or what this complex concept can mean”.
If you don’t see the difference, you’re just going in a loop of trying to argue the wrong point. I was hoping to save you the trouble of “you don’t get it” line, by saying “trust me, I do get it, I’m a god damn expert”.
I’m happy to indulge in explaining things to people who want to learn something. I happily fuck with people who seem disingenuous to that goal. If I was wrong and you genuinely meant to ask “why doesnt this make sense”, then I’m sorry. I misread your intentions, and I’ll keep it in mind.
korendian@lemmy.zip 1 week ago
I’m done with this circular argument. Let me know when you want to actually prove you know what the fuck you’re talking about by getting into the specifics of the mechanics of the diagram that are illogical, in detail as opposed to vague generalities. Why would someone not apply a bloom filter to filter out posts you’ve already seen? Why would you not use connecting lines to show the aspects that are impacted by the user? You continue to refuse to get specific, and just keep going back to “trust me bro”. If that’s all you plan on returning to, let me know so I can stop wasting my time here.
okamiueru@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Works for me!