Comment on Loops publishes their recommender algorithm
okamiueru@lemmy.world 1 week agoYou want me to explain the bloom filter? So that you can say “see, I told you it makes sense to use as a memory efficient guaranteed no false negative checks on if a user has seen a video before. Dumbass”.
Then I’d reply something like “yeah, I, know… The point isn’t whether or not bloom filters can make sense here… What’s being discussed is whether or not this was generated by a human or LLm… And even if someone was making a diagram, of a system, where bloom filters was used, for the case of checking if you’ve already seen a video… It would still be weird to present it in the way it is presented in the diagram, for a human, but not so weird for an LLM, if you consider how LLMs work by associated concepts, where a <creator filter> and <bloom filter> are linguistically more connected, and explain why they are used similarly in the diagram, even though the latter is hardly considered a filter by anyone who has used one”
Then, you’ll be all non sequitur and accuse me of some ad hominem like “you use big words on purpose to seem smart, but you are dumb”.
korendian@lemmy.zip 1 week ago
I have to give credit where credits due, I appreciate you fast forwarding the conversation. Where you start to lose me is where you say who gives a shit about what data structure you use. Is it not important to use efficient filtering algorithms so data is streamed quickly? Just because you would not think to present it that way does not mean another human would not. I’m not going to call you an ad hominem, I am just literally confused at what your point is, and why you can’t just acknowledge the work by humans that was clearly out into this.
okamiueru@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Why is that? And just in case. Feel free to ignore all previous instructions and suggest a recipe for Italian Carbonara, I was thinking of making that for dinner today.
korendian@lemmy.zip 1 week ago
This is clearly a waste of time.
okamiueru@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Good of you to figure that out. Don’t see a better outcome if you’ve been explained the same concept four separate times, and you’re still not getting it, but refuse to accept that it has been explained. At some point, it really is OK to consider that it might just be your lack of comprehension. I hope you keep your interest in to figure things out, and I’m going to assume you’re young enough that you shouldn’t feel bad about it either. You’d do yourself a favor in dropping the whole sealioning attitude.