On the other hand though, say you’ve been writing a web novel that could be sliced up into 3 separate books or you just have 3 books that’s only now getting released. You could release them over time or you could choose to have all 3 go up at once. Not to mention as a first act of defense, it’s a reasonable action to make and is easily adjustable later on.
Comment on Amazon restricts authors from self-publishing more than three books a day after AI concerns
phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
If you’re gone go that way, then limit it to one book per MONTH, anything faster than that would be suspect
Chailles@lemmy.world 1 year ago
echodot@feddit.uk 1 year ago
Multiple authors published in one book wouldn’t happen in self-publishing because there’s no incentive. The point about a collection of short stories is that it isn’t economical for a publisher to publish them individually, but with self-publishing that economic restriction doesn’t exist.
SoaringDE@feddit.de 1 year ago
Make it 12 in a year then
Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Chuck Tingle was pumping out multiple a month before language models were a thing.
JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 year ago
I don’t see a problem with someone publishing a backlog of multiple books at once. 3 per day seems pretty reasonable. Maybe even something like 3 per day and at most 10 per month might work.
phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
A backlog doesn’t give you 3 per day sustained. Limit publishing tone book per day still gives you 30 books per month. Even with a backlog that should be way more than even Stephen King would need.