Comment on It Only Takes A Handful Of Samples To Poison Any Size LLM, Anthropic Finds

• Buffalox@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  You can’t prove a negative, what you should look for is evidence that it works, without such evidence, there is no reason to believe it does.

  source

  • Telorand@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Okay. I have that. Now what?

    source

    • _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Last time I checked out Glaze, around the time it was announced, they refused to release any of their test data, and wouldn’t let people test images they had glazed. Idk why people wouldn’t find it super sus behavior, but either way it’s made moot by the fact that social media compresses images and ruins the glazing anyway, so it’s not really something people creating models worry about. When an artist shares their work, they’re nice enough to deglaze it for us.

      source
    • Buffalox@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Okay. I have that. Now what?

      Then you have your evidence, and your previous post is nonsensical.

      source

      • Telorand@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        That’s not how evidence works. If the original person has evidence that the software doesn’t work, then we need to look at both sets of evidence and adjust our view accordingly.

        It could very well be that the software works 90% of the time, but there could exist some outlying examples where it doesn’t. And if they have those examples, I want to know about them.

        source
• _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Well I haven’t seen any objective evidence that god doesn’t exist, but that don’t mean I believe in her.

  source

  • Telorand@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Okay. Same. I’m not asking you to believe Glaze/Nightshade works on my word alone. All I said was that artists should try it.

    source