Well I haven’t seen any objective evidence that god doesn’t exist, but that don’t mean I believe in her.
Comment on It Only Takes A Handful Of Samples To Poison Any Size LLM, Anthropic Finds
Telorand@reddthat.com 19 hours agoI haven’t seen any objective evidence that they don’t work. I’ve seen anecdotal stories, but nothing in the way of actual proof.
_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 17 hours ago
Telorand@reddthat.com 17 hours ago
Okay. Same. I’m not asking you to believe Glaze/Nightshade works on my word alone. All I said was that artists should try it.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
You can’t prove a negative, what you should look for is evidence that it works, without such evidence, there is no reason to believe it does.
Telorand@reddthat.com 17 hours ago
Okay. I have that. Now what?
Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Then you have your evidence, and your previous post is nonsensical.
Telorand@reddthat.com 3 hours ago
That’s not how evidence works. If the original person has evidence that the software doesn’t work, then we need to look at both sets of evidence and adjust our view accordingly.
It could very well be that the software works 90% of the time, but there could exist some outlying examples where it doesn’t. And if they have those examples, I want to know about them.
_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 17 hours ago
Last time I checked out Glaze, around the time it was announced, they refused to release any of their test data, and wouldn’t let people test images they had glazed. Idk why people wouldn’t find it super sus behavior, but either way it’s made moot by the fact that social media compresses images and ruins the glazing anyway, so it’s not really something people creating models worry about. When an artist shares their work, they’re nice enough to deglaze it for us.