I’d say it’s piracy. The same thing some people went to prison for back in the days when dowloading music from p2p.
Comment on [deleted]
Chef6652@lemmy.world 1 day agoStealing might be a strong word, I agree. But because of this policy, Embark won’t need another recording session out of these actors. Designing the project to never pay the actors that could have worked with them again.
To back this term (“stealing”). I consider that the genAI technology as a whole has been built on the stolen work of the whole world. ChatGPT has been built upon thousands of Github projects without their consent, I suppose Sora, DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, etc have been made in the same way. Training data has been stolen.
Even though it’s a bit far-stretched, using this kind of technology to remove any future human collaboration is stealing to me.
- Stealing (copying) their voice (in the Little Mermaid way)
- Stealing their money (make profit with their unique trait in the future)
- Stealing the work of thousand if not million of people around the world through the genAI technology
Goun@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 1 day ago
It’s not just a “strong word”, it’s incorrect. At most, these platforms are built on copyright infringement, which is not theft. And in this case, it’s not even copyright infringement since they hired a voice actor
kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 1 day ago
Before GenAI, the “copyright infringement is theft” argument was super pro-corpo. It’s the same argument that huge media conglomerates used when they said they lost $X to piracy
krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 10 hours ago
Voice models are not LLMs.
kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 4 hours ago
did you reply to the wrong comment?
krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 4 hours ago
I did not.
It’s an addendum to what you’re saying not a rebuttal.