Comment on Docker security
slazer2au@lemmy.world 1 week agoiptables and firewalld are not reliable
Can you give examples of that?
Comment on Docker security
slazer2au@lemmy.world 1 week agoiptables and firewalld are not reliable
Can you give examples of that?
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 week ago
it’s far easier, and safer to have all your network config done in the network. from system migrations to securing/hardening. it’s far more efficient and effective to have a single source of truth that manages network routing and firewall rules. hell, you can even have a redundant or load balanced firewall configuration if you’re afraid of a single point of failure.
point is, firewalld and iptables is for amateur hour and hobbyists.
if you want to complain that “docker doesn’t respect system firewalls” then at least have the chutzpah enough to do it the right way from the beginning.
slazer2au@lemmy.world 1 week ago
None of those speak to the reliability of iptables. They all sound like skill issues.
In 15 years of network engineering iptables has been the simplest part.
A layered approach with hardware firewalls is valid but when those firewalls get popped, looking at you Cisco, Fortinet, and PA you still want host level restrictions.
Your firewall or switch should never be used as a jump host to servers
atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Which is weird for you to say since practically all of the issues you list are mistakes that amateurs and hobbyists make.
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 week ago
this is selfhosted. a community that’s predominantly amateur or hobbyist.
atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
But absolutely none of the issues you listed are issues with iptables.