Comment on I Went All-In on AI. The MIT Study Is Right.

rimu@piefed.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

• AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I’ve heard that these tools aren’t 100% accurate, but your last point is valid.

  source

  • rimu@piefed.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    GPTZero is 99% accurate.

    https://gptzero.me/news/gptzero-accuracy-stats/

    source

    • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I mean… has anyone other than the company that made the tool said so? Like from a third party?

      source

      • rimu@piefed.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        The answer to that is literally in the first sentence of the body of the article I linked to.

        Cmon, just put in a little bit of effort, please.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I agree but look at that third paragraph, it has the dash that nobody ever uses. Tell tale signs right there

    source

    • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Sure, but plenty of journalists use the em-dash. That’s where LLMs got it from originally. It alone is not a signature of LLM use in journalistic articles (I’m not calling this CTO guy a journalist, to be clear)

      source

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Context is everything. In publishing it’s standard; in online forums it’s either needlessly pretentious or AI and either way they deserve to be called out.

        source
      • pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        When I mean “nobody uses it” I mean nobody other than people getting paid writing for a living would use it. This tech bro would not use that em dash and the quotation marks you can’t also find on the keyboard.

        source
• LiveLM@lemmy.zip ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Aren’t these LLM detectors super inaccurate?

  source

  • rimu@piefed.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I’ve tested lots and lots of different ones. GPTZero is really good.

    If you read the article again, with a critical perspective, I think it will be obvious.

    source
• Randelung@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Yes, but also the opposite. Don’t discount a valid point just because it was formulated using an LLM.

  source

  • rimu@piefed.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    The story was invented so people would subscribe to his substack, which exists to promote his company.

    We’re being manipulated into sharing made-up rage-bait in order to put money in his pocket.

    source
• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Lol the irony… You’re doing literally the exact same thing by trusting that site because it confirms your view

  source