Comment

Comment on AI finds errors in 90% of Wikipedia's best articles

lime@feddit.nu ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

it’s mostly outsourcing attention, which is pretty acceptable for a large project like wikipedia.

Sort:hotnew top

yakko@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
Right - I won’t call it a good thing to let people deskill on reading comprehension skills, but they’re donating their labour to a public benefit! I’m hardly going to scold them as if I was their professor.

source
- lime@feddit.nu ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  my thought is mainly that there aren’t enough hours in the day to read and check everything on wikipedia. there’s a reason the scots vandalism went unnoticed so long, people just don’t have the time.
  
  source
Bldck@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
That’s my main use for LLMs

I write the code logic, the main argument points, etc

let the LLM lint, format and structure the discussion

I provide another round of copy editing, styling and other updates
source
- lime@feddit.nu ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  personally i have separate linters, formatters and structure markers that don’t raise the temperature of my apartment when in use, but you do you.
  
  source