I wish they'd replace Tim Sweeney with AI. Would genuinely have better takes on most topics, too. Sigh.
QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 7 hours ago
If “everyone will be using AI” and it’s not a bad thing, then these big companies should wear it as a badge of honor. The rest of us will buy accordingly.
Carighan@piefed.world 3 hours ago
RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
Can we get AI version of the old burnout Tim Sweeney? He was as least unintentionally funny.
Devial@discuss.online 6 hours ago
If “everyone will be using AI”, AI will turn to shit.
They can’t create originality, they’re only recycling and recontextualising existing information. But if you recycle and recontextualise the same information over and over again, it keeps degrading more and more.
It’s ironic that the very people who advocate for AI everywhere, fail to realise just how dependent the quality of AI content is on having real, human generated content to input to train the model.
CatsPajamas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 minutes ago
How does this model collapse thing still get spread around? It’s not true. Synthetic data has actually helped bots get smarter, not dumber. And if you think that all Gemini3 does is recycle idk what to tell you
4am@lemmy.zip 4 hours ago
“The people who advocate for AI” are literally running around claiming that AI is Jesus and it is sacrilege to stand against it.
And by literally, I mean Peter Thiel is giving talks actually claiming this. This is not an exaggeration, this is not hyperbole.
They are trying to recruit techno-cultists.
Sl00k@programming.dev 3 hours ago
I think the grey area is what if you’re an indie dev and did the entire story line and artwork yourself, but have the ai handle more complex coding.
It is to our eyes entirely original but used AI. Where do you draw the line?
Default_Defect@anarchist.nexus 2 hours ago
Disclose the AI usage and how it was used. Let people decide. There will always be “no AI at all, ever” types that won’t touch the game, but others will see that it was used as a tool rather than a replacement for creativity and will give it a chance.
Devial@discuss.online 3 hours ago
The line, imo, is: are you creating it yourself, and just using AI to help you make it faster/more convenient, or is AI the primary thing that is creating your content in the first place.
Using AI for convenience is absolutely valid imo, I routinely use chatGPT to do things like debugging code I wrote, or rewriting data sets in different formats, instead of doing to by hand, or using it for more complex search and replace jobs, if I can’t be fucked to figure out a regex to cover it.
For these kind of jobs, I think AI is a great tool.
Sl00k@programming.dev 13 minutes ago
I definitely agree but I think that case would still get caught in the steam AI usage badge?