You could skip the detour through hashes/electricity and do something with a proof-of-stake cryptocurrency, and just pay for access. The site owner actually gets compensated instead of burning dead dinosaurs.
Maybe if the act of transferring crypto didn’t use a comparable or greater amount of energy…
natecox@programming.dev 3 weeks ago
The cost here only really impacts regular users, too. The type of users you actually want to block have budgets which easily allow for the compute needed anyways.
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
I think maybe they wouldn’t if they are trying to scale their operations to scanning through millions of sites and your site is just one of them
cadekat@pawb.social 3 weeks ago
Yeah, exactly. A regular user isn’t going to notice an extra few cents on their electricity bill (boiling water costs more), but a data centre certainly will when you scale up.