For the non-tankies
Comment on It's been a while, which Lemmy instances should I be on?
davel@lemmy.ml 4 months agoThere is no left equivalent, and horseshoe theory is horseshit.
- ‘Horseshoe theory’ is nonsense – the far right and far left have little in common
- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_theory#Academic_s…
- Funny thing about Hannah Arendt’s construction of “totalitarianism”: She came from a bourgeois family and so was unsurprisingly anti-communist. She was also quite racist, and her work was funded & promoted by the CIA.
Imperialist Propaganda and the Ideology of the Western Left Intelligentsia: From Anticommunism and Identity Politics to Democratic Illusions and FascismOne of the centerpieces of the cultural cold war was the Congress for Cultural Freedom (CCF), which was revealed in 1966 to be a CIA front. Hugh Wilford, who has researched the topic extensively, described the CCF as nothing short of one of the largest patrons of art and culture in the history of the world. Established in 1950, it promoted on the international scene the work of collaborationist academics such as Raymond Aron and Hannah Arendt over and against their Marxian rivals, including the likes of Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir.
Deceptichum@quokk.au 4 months ago
davel@lemmy.ml 4 months ago
Yes, please do read it:
The comparison of Nazism and Stalinism is controversial in academia.
See also: Horseshoe theory
Jax@sh.itjust.works 4 months ago
Here’s a thread with geneva_convenience suggesting that “blood and soil” really isn’t that bad.
Remember, if you argue this hard for .ml — you don’t deserve rights.
davel@lemmy.ml 4 months ago
Jax@sh.itjust.works 4 months ago
So you’ve chosen to attack this and say nothing about blood and soil.
Ok buddy, I’m sure your moral high ground really matters here. Want to pull in some more people to help you flail around miserably?
davel@lemmy.ml 4 months ago
Why didn’t I address some random, unrelated post? For one, geneva isn’t a Marxist-Leninist, he’s not a “tankie.” And for two, you’re the one who introduced “blood and soil” into that conversation, not him. He didn’t claim that “blood and soil” is “not that bad”; that’s your interpretation of what he said.