Comment on Plex’s crackdown on free remote streaming access starts this week - Ars Technica

• roofuskit@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  It has several unsecured endpoints.

  github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/5415

  source

  • tyler@programming.dev ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Aside from most of those being “potential issues”, which weren’t proven, the rest are GETs of things that do not need to be secret, things like album art and list of installed plugins. Besides the one plugin issue, which was an actual security issue, which was fixed over a year and a half ago. github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/pull/11436

    Contrast that with Plex which has numerous high severity CVEs that include things like remote code execution, directory traversal, and more.

    source

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      list of installed plugins.

      Yeah, as you said, that’s a pretty serious security issue. That’s a data leak that explicitly lays out the shape of your attack surface. It tells the attacker exactly what additional software your server is running and if any of it includes known vulnerabilities, the attacker now knows how to gain access.

      source
    • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      And you think if Jellyfin were a comparable size, there wouldn’t be just as many or more?

      source
    • fartsparkles@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      You’re aware those CVEs are only relevant for ancient versions of Plex and were fixed long ago?

      source
  • warm@kbin.earth ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Isn't that the point of major version upgrades? To make breaking changes?

    source

    • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Its also possible for a webserver to offer two versions of an API. Add a new one that needs authentication, mark the old one as deprecated and add a checkbox to disable it. Then clients can update to use the secure one and if you use and unmaintained client you can enable the old insecure api

      source