LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 day ago
It’s pretty clear that deepseek is not open source, or at least shouldn’t be considered within the spirit of open source.
It seems like if we want to have truly open source llms, a new standard for transparency is needed.
Cooper8@feddit.online 1 day ago
Check out Apertus , the Swiss are showing how it should be done. 100% open: architecture, training data, weights, recipes, and final models all publicly available and licenses Apache 2.0. https://ethz.ch/en/news-and-events/eth-news/news/2025/09/press-release-apertus-a-fully-open-transparent-multilingual-language-model.html
BroBot9000@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Until the Swiss privacy laws change and the clankers start reporting to the new Fash government with the older versions getting deleted.
Just don’t fucking use Ai.
Cooper8@feddit.online 17 hours ago
You can run it yourself on a closed network if you’re worried about telemetry, that’s part of the point.