That’s fine. I don’t.
I would also generally consider £1/hour of gameplay to be pretty terrible value tbh. Truly good games are more like £0.10/hour or less
FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 hours ago
People spend like $20 to watch a 2 hour movie, $1/hr isn’t that unreasonable
Lfrith@lemmy.ca 6 hours ago
2 hour movies are also competing with streaming services like Netflix where people can see as many hours of TV shows and movies as they want. Some just stick to youtube which requires no money and has some free movies there too.
Its like how people can drop hundreds and thousands of hours on f2p games without spending any money. $/hr valuation is outdated.
Agent_Karyo@piefed.world 16 hours ago
Not to mention that not all gaming hours are equally fungible.
There can be shorter narrative games where a given hour is worth more (to me), so the higher per hour cost is justified.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 hours ago
Agree 100%. Played Dispatch last week and had a blast. Very short, but worth the money imo
Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 13 hours ago
To you perhaps. Cinema is less than half that cost here and even then I go less than once a year because I don’t really feel like most films that come out are worth bothering to see given the combined effort and cost.
Jambalaya@lemmy.zip 17 hours ago
If you only look at $/hr, there are some 70 hr games which milk your time and should have been shorter, like Assassin’s Creed, and then there are short, story rich games, like Outer Wilds, which are absolutely worth it even at more than a dollar an hour.
Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 17 hours ago
Prefer games like Factorio or Rimworld that you can get many 100s of hours from.