Thats closer to the global number, but local numbers can be far worse. If you look at just the US its under 20% of crop calories went to people. The rest went to livestock and machines.
Thats closer to the global number, but local numbers can be far worse. If you look at just the US its under 20% of crop calories went to people. The rest went to livestock and machines.
hans@feddit.org 2 days ago
the claim was about global crops. your cherry picking now.
Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
I’m being more specific. I dont think it makes sense to look globally. The west can offset a lot of its bad practices if you include the rest of the world that doesnt.
I understand if you dont care much about this point though.
hans@feddit.org 2 days ago
this is irrelevant to whether it’s a lie that 70% of global crops are fed to animals