I'd like for you to point that part out, as the only other reference is here:
From the commentary/guidance for Article 92:
“An order is presumed lawful. … A general order or regulation is lawful unless it is contrary to the Constitution, the laws of the United States, or lawful superior orders …”
Asafum@feddit.nl 14 hours ago
Cool cool cool cool.
“Ok troops, we’re taking this list of registered Democrats and killing them all.”
Military court:
“Are you insane? Of course that’s no-…”
(Judge removed)
“New judge, can you take Trump’s dick out of your mouth so you can rule on this?”
“Yep. All good here. That was a lawful order, hope you carried it out completely.”
ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 14 hours ago
That’s Against the Rules thought continuing to rack up Ls against Who’s Gonna Stop Me doctrine
Solano@piefed.social 10 hours ago
As ridiculous as that sounds, yes, this is to be expected. They already weakened the military courts, but I don’t know the extent, just remember there were some articles about it earlier in the year. Also, I don’t know if history has an example of any large groups of military refusing an order, not counting coups.