I don’t want to love him. I just feel like I’d never find anyone better, if I left, you know?
Comment on When we eat the billionaires, we should spare Gabe Newell? No?
amzd@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Why? He takes a 30% cut from every game sale just because his platform has a dominant grasp on gamers.
I don’t understand how people can hate taxes (which go on to pay for schools and roads) but not the way larger cut that digital storefronts charge.
ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 day ago
amzd@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Is this one of those “the ogre has fallen I love with the princess” farquaad meme situations
ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Probably? I’m not even the fucking princess tho?
Mac@mander.xyz 1 day ago
Hey QT. twirls hair
30p87@feddit.org 1 day ago
I hate misused taxes.
Gabe at least gives us 95% greatness back (5% being gambling)
amzd@lemmy.world 1 day ago
He has an 111m superyacht, he is not giving you anything my friend, I’m sorry.
30p87@feddit.org 1 day ago
Proton, nice return policies, the best launcher, disclosure of BS like ML, other launchers, kernel level anticheat. Just a few.
Relative to his wealth? No. Relative to others? A lot.
Hawke@lemmy.world 1 day ago
The ability to play almost 100% of my games on my preferred OS is definitely something.
caoimhinr@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
Devs can just generate keys and sell elsewhere to avoid the 30% cut.
rikudou@lemmings.world 1 day ago
Pff, I wish my overall taxation was only 30%.
anyhow2503@lemmy.world 1 day ago
There’s an argument to be made that it’s too high of a cut, especially these days. A lot of this money has funded great improvements to the gaming ecosystem and many open source projects. The major competing storefronts/launchers do not come even slightly close to the feature set that Steam provides, but they have tried attracting users through exclusivity deals. It’s very telling that some successful competitors (like itch or gog) actually offer some unique benefits and aren’t attached to some incredibly controversial corporations…
Valve isn’t free from criticism and their role as a monopolist should definitely be scrutinized, especially as companies often radically change for the worse in behaviour and culture, but a lot of this critical attention was instigated by Epic CEO Tim Sweeney who can frankly gargle my nuts.