At a fundamental level you’re just discussing different system designs.
Public transit systems prioritize efficient resource use, but they do so at the expense of flexibility and resiliency.
Russia can launch a missile and take out the power to a whole Ukrainian neighbourhood because they all efficiently share a power grid. If they each operated on their own microgrid it would be more expensive and less resource efficient to setup, but it would be more resilient in the face of disruption and easier to move.
That’s all your really discussing here and it’s a common trade off in system design.
JustJack23@slrpnk.net 10 hours ago
Yes, but one system is destructive, polluting and shifts the cost of transportation on the individual. So one system is clearly better here. That is why no one (ok very few people) who have electrified house or apartment decides “you know what I will need a diesel generator”.
masterspace@lemmy.ca 10 hours ago
Many many many people do have diesel generators for backup power in the case the grid goes down.
And if you’re building out a new solar system, most will build battery backups for the same reason + cost optimizing.
If your point is that fossil fuels are more polluting than electric motors, then sure, yeah, we all agree.
If your point is that we should always optimize for resource efficiency over flexibility and resiliency, then I think you’re a little misguided, as I see no arguments for not building solar microgrids.
JustJack23@slrpnk.net 9 hours ago
No my problem is not with the diesel generator, I wanted to contradict the individualistic approach to transportation in our current society with the collectivistic approach of something like our energy grid.
There was another example with septic tanks vs plumbing. You can say the same for drilling wells vs again plumbing I guess.
Solar microgrids are very interesting technology in particula and very positive again because you can connect and coordinate them collectively with you neighbors for example. With the added benefit of flexibility and resilience the current grid doesn’t have.
masterspace@lemmy.ca 9 hours ago
They are still a waste of resources compared to a purely collective solution like you’re advocating for.
The most efficient use of resources would be to build massive solar farms in warm sunny areas like Arizona, and then build massive distribution grids to where it’s needed. But this sacrifices resiliency and flexibility.
It’s no different then diesel generators.