It is in the long term given that known uranium reserves are only good for a few hundred years of global energy requirements. Thorium is far more plentiful.
Comment on China reaches energy independence milestone by ‘breeding’ uranium from thorium
Valmond@lemmy.world 5 months ago
We can already recycle 90% (IIRC) of used uranium, so it doesn’t seem like a geopolitical game changer.
Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Dogyote@slrpnk.net 5 months ago
IIRC isn’t a good source
Valmond@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Here you go in french it’s actually 96%. I don’t know if you can re-recycle it at that level the second time.
Dogyote@slrpnk.net 5 months ago
No! That’s not what it fucking says. High activity waste is 0.2% of waste volume but has 96% of radioactivity.
This is a quote from the translated article:
The IV generation reactors don’t really exist yet. According to this source, maybe one or two do exist. So no, 96% of spent fuel is not being recycled. Stop spreading misinformation, you’re as useless as chatgpt.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 months ago
We’ve always been able to reuse uranium, but it was outlawed in the 70s to prevent the eventual production of plutonium.
Valmond@lemmy.world 5 months ago
You have to read further, there are several “96%” in the article. Search for: