Comment on Minecraft is removing code obfuscation in Java Edition

• chunes@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I mean releasing it under a license like GPL.

  source

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Because then anyone could fork it and redistribute the game which I presume they don’t want.

    It would be sweet for us if they did, but I can see why they don’t want to do that.

    source

    • chunes@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Not really. They could distribute source ports of the game, but you’d still have to buy the game in order to make use of them.

      source

      • sus@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        That’s definitely not how GPL specifically works, and the small amount of sales of doom 2 today is not at all comparable to the massive amount of minecraft sales and minecraft-related microtransactions that microsoft is raking in.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Fork it and use your own texture and sound pack doesn’t sound like much work tbh. Any major modpack could just redistribute the game as a fork and it would be awesome. But Microsoft probably don’t want that.

        source
    • captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Things like Minetest exist.

      source

      • dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Yes, but Minetest/Luanti is not a fork of Minecraft, it is its own separate thing.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • JackbyDev@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I’d love to see that but realistically I don’t ever see it happening.

    source