I think that’s down to each individual case, but I’d fear that some, if not most, users would eventually want more than just screwing a doll…
BussyGyatt@feddit.org 23 hours ago
Child sex abuse
They keep using that phrase, but keep repeatedly describing a distinct lack of child sex abuse. While extraordinarily distasteful, I decidedly prefer the idea of a pedophile using one of these distinctly-not-abusive dolls instead of practicing their sexuality on an actual child. Ironically, demonizing this relatively healthy expression of sexuality increases the odds that an actual child actually gets abused.>
FireWire400@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Taleya@aussie.zone 20 hours ago
Ok i draw the line at “relatively healthy” as being sexually attracted to children literally requires the part of your brain that identifies viable sexual partners to be malfunctioning
BussyGyatt@feddit.org 18 hours ago
“Relatively” was the direct comparison I made between practising sexuality on a childlike doll, and practising sexuality on a child. That is relatively healthy. In comparison.
Zagorath@aussie.zone 9 hours ago
I’ve heard arguments both ways, and frankly I don’t know which is better supported by evidence. One, that things like this, AI CSAM, etc. might provide a safe outlet for people with paedophilia, and the other is that it can encourage them and act as a “gateway drug” of sorts. It’s an area that I assume the experts are already doing/have already done research on, and I’ll defer to them because I don’t really want to investigate too much further. It may even be the case that some substitutes work well and others don’t.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 hours ago
Sooner or later they would want the real thing, if they become desensitized to the fake ones
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 hours ago
Just like how I started my car jacking career in GTA