I don’t know, I saw a YouTube video of a dog trainer who watched the video and basically said Hasan wasn’t likely to be abusing his dog, at least based off the specific video in question.
I’m not a fan of Hasan. I agree with a lot of what he has to say in regards to political matters, but I’m just not into the drama that surrounds debate bro culture in which he is a major figure.
That said, this issue with his dog is potentially a smear campaign, and there seems to be at least some credible evidence to suggest it is.
Here is the dog trainer in question. He claims to not have any political or social affiliation with Hasan, which I take at face value, but you can ascertain for yourself whether or not to believe him or not.
Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 hours ago
I hate you
z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 10 hours ago
Not according to any dog trainer you’d speak to. Sorry dude, I default to experts in their fields when considering thinfs, not just my emotional gut reaction.
But if you’re a certified dog trainer, I’d be willing to give your opinion equal consideration.
Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 hours ago
It doesnt matter. You’ve already proved my point.
The question was did hasan shock his dog. No only do you accept he shocked his dog now you are completely on board with it.
Chow
z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 10 hours ago
Ugh. Okay man, the expert’s opinion doesn’t matter. You win, lol.
Like I say, I’m not a fan of Hasan, as I find debate bros culture kind of distasteful, but the only way you can convince me that Hasan definitely abused his dog is to provide me with a contrary argument provided by someone who is an expert on dog training.
I’ll wait dude, seriously. Just provide me with any evidence that has a shred of credibility.