If your argument attacks my credibility, that’s fine, you don’t know me. We can find cases where developers use the technology and cases where they refuse.
Do you have anything substantive to add to the discussion about whether AI LLMs are anything more than just a tool that allows workers to further abstract, advancing all of the professions it can touch towards any of: better / faster / cheaper / easier?
kescusay@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yeah, I have never spent “days” setting anything up. Anyone who can’t do it without spending “days” struggling with it is not reading the documentation.
HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 1 month ago
Ever work in an enterprise environment? Sometimes a single talented developer cannot overcome the calcification of hundreds of people over several decades who care more about the optics of work than actual work. Documentation cannot help if its non-existent/20 years old. Documentation cannot make teams that don't believe in automation, adopt Docker.
Not that I expect Sam Altman to understand what it's like working in a dumpster fire company, his only job is to just pour the gasoline.
killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Dumpster fire companies are the ones he’s targeting because they’re the mostly like to look for quick and cheap ways to fix the symptoms of their problems, and most likely to want to replace their employees with automations.
galaxy_nova@lemmy.world 1 month ago
You guys are getting documentation?
kescusay@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Well, if I’m not, then neither is an LLM.
But for most projects built with modem tooling, the documentation is fine, and they mostly have simple CLIs for scaffolding a new application.
galaxy_nova@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I mean if you use the code base you’re working in as context it’ll probably learn the code base faster than you will, although I’m not saying that’s a good strategy, I’d never personally do that
vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 month ago
Sometimes documentation is inconsistent.