Comment on This should be illegal

• ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Until ChatGPT is shut down. Have control over your waifus, people!

  source

  • GhostMatter@lemmy.ca ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Let’s take back the means of waifus!

    source

    • Drusenija@lemmy.drusenija.com ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      One could say you must seize the means of reproduction.

      source

      • eestileib@sh.itjust.works ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Representative Boebert has been a commie all along! 🤯

        source
      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Don’t think reproduction has anything to do with this.

        source
  • magikmw@lemm.ee ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    At least the general idea behind language models isn’t proprietary and fairly well available in ooen source. Sure, GPT is better, but it could change.

    source
  • smashboy@kbin.social ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Well, Llama 2 then.

    source
• recursive_recursion@programming.dev ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  hmm not sure if that would work as the model that he was using would be different from what’s available so he’d probably notice some differences which might cause a mix of uncanny valley and surrealism/suspension of disbelief where the two are not the same

  plus using a chat-only model would be real tragic as it’s a significant downgrade from what they already had

  his story actually feels like a Romeo and Juliet situation

  source

  • Surreal@programming.dev ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    LLM is capable of role-playing, character.ai for example can get into the role of any character after being trained

    source
  • brsrklf@jlai.lu ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Doesn’t even take a change of service provider to get there.

    Replika had what had very obviously become a virtual mate service too, until they decided “love” wasn’t part of their system anymore. Probably because it looked bad for investors, as happened for a lot of AI-based services people used for smut.

    So a bunch of lonely people had their “virtual companion” suddenly lobotomized, and there’s nothing they could do about it.

    source

    • SCB@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I always thought replika was a sex chatbot? Is/was it “more” than that?

      source

      • brsrklf@jlai.lu ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        It’s… complicated.

        At first the idea was it’d be training an actual “replica” of yourself, that could reflect your own personality. Then when they realized their was a demand for companionship they converted it into virtual friend. Then of course there was a demand for “more than friends”, and yeah, they made it possible to create a custom mate for a while.

        Then suddenly it became a problem for them to be seen as a light porn generator. Probably because investors don’t want to touch that, or maybe because of a terms of servce change with their AI service provider.

        At that point they started to censor lewd interactions and pretend replika was never supposed to be more than a friendly bot you can talk to. Which is, depending on how you interpret what services they proposed and how they advertized them until then, kind of a blatant lie.

        source