The German version of that very article says it’s not possible. Now what? w(°ｏ°)w
Comment on Full list of areas in the UK targeted in ‘dodgy’ Fire TV stick crackdown
JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 week agoen.wikipedia.org/wiki/TV_detector_van#Line-scan
You can’t really detect “TV signals”, but you can quite easily detect the 10.125 kHz horizontal line-scanning deflection coil of a CRT. Though I’m fairly sure even if they did originally start effective back in the 1950’s because people had very few elecronic devices around, actually detecting anything accurately must have been increasingly difficult as time went on, and a lot of the newer models must have been more about being a scare tactic.
Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 week ago
SolSerkonos@piefed.social 1 week ago
Uh, really? The English version is pretty convincing that it is- it even lists three different methods they used over the years. The sources seem convincing, but I’m quite literally judging the book by it’s title there.
Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 week ago
I know so very little about all this, I can only take people’s word for anything. ¯\(°_o)/¯
shoe@feddit.uk 1 week ago
Scare tactics definitely play a part of it but, having seen official documentation covering up to reasonably recently (can say no more, sorry), I can confirm the technology did continue to evolve and detection was possible and the vans are real. I’m sure it’s continued to evolve since those old docs too, and I can’t say it was ever particularly effective, but there was some clever stuff at play from what I read!
Of course it’s all in aid of a horribly outdated principle, and I don’t approve of the scare tactics or intimidating nonsense letters, but I can appreciate some clever tech and documentation :)