Comment on No evidence that UFOs are aliens — NASA attempts to make conversations about aerial phenomena more scientific

• atzanteol@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  What is “real” for a UAP?

  source

  • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    your comment basically confirms you did not read my previous comment where i shared an example that nasa disclosed with a link. there is even a non blurry video of one…

    source

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I’m asking you to define your term. It confirms nothing.

      source

      • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        It’s not “my term” you can find the meaning of real in the dictionary.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • SCB@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        We have many documented UAPs that have no explanation. That’s what he means by “real UAP.”

        “No evidence of aliens” is not scientist for “no” here because we do have an unexplainable thing that, in the set of plausible explanations, includes “aliens.” NASA is saying there is no proof it is alien, so the entire set of plausible unexplained reasons is still in play

        The way science works is we will slowly chip away at what that set contains.

        Now stop being a dick.

        source

        • -> View More Comments