Comment on No evidence that UFOs are aliens — NASA attempts to make conversations about aerial phenomena more scientific

• lorez@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  No, it’s not. It’s scientist for we don’t know.

  source

  • ours@lemmy.film ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    You’re missing his point. It’s not not knowing, it’s “current empirical evidence points to X conclusion”.

    Science is always open to changing their conclusion based on new evidence. People take that as doubt while con-men bring them absolute answers with absolute confidence and mistake this for facts.

    source

    • lorez@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Exactly. Sorry if I expressed my thoughts all wrong. But that’s what I meant, that science always awaits new evidence.

      source
• 5BC2E7@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  my reply had nothing to do with “that conclusion” so you are not making any sense.

  source

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    What is “real” for a UAP?

    source

    • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      your comment basically confirms you did not read my previous comment where i shared an example that nasa disclosed with a link. there is even a non blurry video of one…

      source

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        I’m asking you to define your term. It confirms nothing.

        source

        • -> View More Comments