Comment on The demise of Flash didn't bring any big HTML5/JS equivalent for watching animations; fast internet and better video compression made those types of animations become raster videos as well

<- View Parent
PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

So yes, there has been a massive, massive increase in non-flash video content

how many of those are animated video. holy willful misinterpretation.

In fact, most of the old flash videos have more views on youtube than they ever had in their original forms.

what point do you think you’re making here?
this whole thread is lamenting the fall of interactive animation. you cant hide a funny mouse-over easter-eggs in a youtube video, like OP is talking about. The file sizes are huge.

Flash was abandoned as fast as possible as soon as newer, easier and better alternatives arrived.

except that the alternatives that fulfill the wants of OP are way harder to make the equivalent art.

You have been elitist as fuck throughout all your comments in this chain, thinking that you are somehow better than everyone else because you got stuck in some old software and didn’t manage to migrate to something better.

Only because, as you demonstrated in the other thread, you’ve (willfully?) misread what I’ve said. meanwhile you’ve just told people “learn to code or pick up a camera, fuck the art that you actually wanted to make”

source
Sort:hotnewtop