Pre-1990, you’re mostly looking at the NES library as the go to. The older Atari games I don’t think are worth it, outside of the historical context angle.
I’d say give Zelda I and II another shot. They are clunky, as most things from the era will be. But when you engage with them on their own terms, I think they’re both really rewarding experiences.Don’t be afraid to look for hints, some things can be obtuse - you can probably find old magazines in the Internet archives to reference.
If 1990 exactly counts, Crystalis is a Zelda-like with RPG elements that outdoes Zelda is many ways.
Castlevania is another one that’s really great, but very clunky. There’s no air control, so once you jump that’s your arc.
SMB 1-3 you probably have played before, but if not those hold up.
Even more frictionless, the first 2 or 3 Mega Man games feel just as refined as if they were made today.
Ninja Gaiden is known for challnge, but it also controls super smoothly and feels good to play.
Basically I guess my recs are mostly just explore the NES library. There’s some Sega worth checking out and probably TurboGrafx too, but NES had most of the classics.
What kinds of newer games do you generally like?
FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
With all due respect, I have to disagree with you there. You seem to be lumping all Atari games into the 2600 category. The Atari computers had plenty of classics.
Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves
Star Raiders
Choplifter
Miner 2049er
The list goes on and on, and if you add in the Commodore, Apple, and TI computers it gets even bigger. Pre 90 consoles, you have Colecovision, Intellivision, etc. Of which I personally love love love Utopia for the Intellivision.
emb@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Valid! Computers are a huge blindspot for me, and there’s no doubt depth there.