Comment on Framework supporting far-right racists?
BombOmOm@lemmy.world 23 hours agodon’t the tankies not believe in those allegations? Isn’t that their whole thing, that western media is lying about it? Ie delusional like I said.
Of course they don’t believe the allegations. The point is they support the genocide either way. If we are changing the standard to purely what delusional people, not what they actually support, then there is a ton of people on the right people should stop bitching about, as they don’t believe their policies are harmful either…
So, back to the original question, are you going to use a software written, or partly written, by tankies?
balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 20 hours ago
I already answered that: your question is trying to move the goalposts away from what framework is doing.
BombOmOm@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
Either that or a pair of opinions you hold conflict with each-other.
Internal consistency is highly valued. As long as all opinions are treated with the same standards, then you have a nice steady base for your own views and how you interact with the world.
balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 14 hours ago
Yeah I figured it out from another message: intent matters. Framework appears to intend to support bad people. Tankies support bad causes but appear to think they are good. That moves the question to “what is good”. Obviously white nationalists have a definition of good that I don’t agree with but they think they are doing good or at least claim as such. However I think I generally agree with tankies, broadly, on their definition of good. I just think they are self deluded into believing that the world simply isn’t as simple and awful as it appears to be. That having been said, my reference point for tankies is a few memes, so it may be that there’s depths of evil there that I’m not aware of. However what I’ve seen is that they seem to be pro workers rights, anti capitalist power, etc…all of which I broadly agree with.
BombOmOm@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Framework intends to support open source projects. That has been their goal. Ascribing a different intent to it is just factually incorrect at best.