Comment on Framework supporting far-right racists?
balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 1 day agoIf you’re going to hold lemmy to the same standard we are holding lemmy to in this thread, absolutely yes. Did you not see the detailed links provided by oop?
BombOmOm@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Of course they don’t believe the allegations. The point is they support the genocide either way. If we are changing the standard to purely what delusional people, not what they actually support, then there is a ton of people on the right people should stop bitching about, as they don’t believe their policies are harmful either…
So, back to the original question, are you going to use a software written, or partly written, by tankies?
balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 1 day ago
I already answered that: your question is trying to move the goalposts away from what framework is doing.
BombOmOm@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
Either that or a pair of opinions you hold conflict with each-other.
Internal consistency is highly valued. As long as all opinions are treated with the same standards, then you have a nice steady base for your own views and how you interact with the world.
balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 17 hours ago
Yeah I figured it out from another message: intent matters. Framework appears to intend to support bad people. Tankies support bad causes but appear to think they are good. That moves the question to “what is good”. Obviously white nationalists have a definition of good that I don’t agree with but they think they are doing good or at least claim as such. However I think I generally agree with tankies, broadly, on their definition of good. I just think they are self deluded into believing that the world simply isn’t as simple and awful as it appears to be. That having been said, my reference point for tankies is a few memes, so it may be that there’s depths of evil there that I’m not aware of. However what I’ve seen is that they seem to be pro workers rights, anti capitalist power, etc…all of which I broadly agree with.