Comment

Comment on The Great Software Quality Collapse: How We Normalized Catastrophe

fodor@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

All of the examples are commercial products. The author doesn’t know or doesn’t realize that this is a capitalist problem. Of course, there is bloat in some open source projects. But nothing like what is described in those examples.

And I don’t think you can avoid that if you’re a capitalist. You make money by adding features that maybe nobody wants. And you need to keep doing something new. Maintenance doesn’t make you any money.

So this looks like AI plus capitalism.

source

Sort:hotnew top

AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
Sometimes, I feel like writers know that it’s capitalism, but they don’t want to actually call the problem what it is, for fear of scaring off people who would react badly to it. I think there’s probably a place for this kind of oblique rhetoric, but I agree with you that progress is unlikely if we continue pussyfooting around the problem

source
MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
But the toolong gets bloatier too, even if it does the same. Extrem example Android apps.

source
vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
“Open source” is not contradictory to “capitalist”, just involves a fair bit of industry alliances and\or freeloading.

source
- Jason2357@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  “Open source” was literally invented to make Free software palatable to capitol.
  
  source
- Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  It absolutely is to the majority of capitalists unless it still somehow directly benefits them monetarily
  
  source
HugeNerd@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

You make money by adding features that maybe nobody wants

So, um, who buys them?

source
- Nalivai@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Capitalism’s biggest lie is that people have freedom to chose what to buy. But they have to buy what the ruling class sells them. When every billionaire is obsessed with chatbots, every app has a chatbot attached, and if you don’t want a chatbot, sucks to be you then, you have to pay for it anyway.
  
  source
- floofloof@lemmy.ca ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  It’s just about convincing investors that you’re going places. People don’t have to want your features or buy more of your stuff because it has them. Just keep the investors convinced that you’re the future.
  
  source
- kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  A midlevel director who doesn’t use the tool but thinks all the cool features a salesperson mentioned seem cool
  
  source
- rumba@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  Stockholders
  
  Stockholders want the products they own stock in to have AI features so they won’t be ‘left behind’
  
  source
- Manticore@lemmy.nz ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  Sponsors maybe? Adding features because somebody influential wants them to be there. Either for money (like shovelware) or soft power (strengthening ongoing business partnerships)
  
  source