Comment on AI-powered CRISPR could lead to faster gene therapies, Stanford Medicine study finds
echodot@feddit.uk 3 weeks agoNo I doesn’t.
The problem is the term AI has become so broadly used that it’s become meaningless. Does a popular quote about how the quota doesn’t want AI to replace artistic jobs, as if it will. As if generative AI and large language models and projects like this are the same.
When the bubble bursts, (please let it be soon) we’re still going to have all of the science AIs because those are actually useful. What we don’t need is AI girlfriends.
Perspectivist@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
That’s because “AI” is an extremely broad term. That’s like saying the term “plants” has lost its meaning because it’s so broadly used.
echodot@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
Yes I know the title has the word AI powered in it. I never claimed otherwise.
Perspectivist@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
I make three claims and your response only fits one of them.
No it doesn’t.
No it doesn’t.
No it doesn’t.
echodot@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
I didn’t say no it doesn’t, read my post again and then come back and apologise to me because I’m agreeing with you you obnoxious idiot.
ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Yes you did
echodot@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
If you’re going to quote some text quote the actual text because you’ll notice that you’re changing it.
I didn’t say “no it doesn’t” I said “no I doesn’t” which is a different sentence.