Comment

Comment on Framework supporting far-right racists?

NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

You say it’s a solved problem in one area as though it should be a solved problem elsewhere

Yes. That is the point. This problem has already been solved. “Well we don’t do that” is not an explanation of why it is suddenly a problem here: it is an admission of incompetence.

Don’t get me wrong. There are very much reasons to consider whether that solution applies. That is not what you, and the other… moving on, are doing.

You instead continue to insist that we should… give money to known bigoted chuds because we still let the Hindus and the Buddhists use swastikas?

source

Sort:hotnew top

palordrolap@fedia.io ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

You are [...] implying that people of (generally) Asian religions need to change their iconography

That is not and was not my intent, and I was less sure of yours until just now. (This may be reading (in)comprehension on my part, to which I'll be happy to admit fault.)

So, let me make sure I'm understanding you. Are you saying that you think that any and all gains from bigoted or unethical sources should be thrown away and that we should have nothing to do with them?

I understand why people would be extremely uncomfortable with some of these and I even think that where we can, we should avoid them, but we can't get rid of everything.

If we must insist on everything then the whole of humanity needs to get in the sea because we're all products of humanity's inhumanity if you go back far enough. In many cases, it's not that far.

If we say "nothing" then we give way to terrible people and let them have free reign.

So tell me. Where is the line? I still think that's a fairly difficult question, even if you don't.

source
- NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  
  So, let me make sure I’m understanding you. Are you saying that you think that any and all gains from bigoted or unethical sources should be thrown away and that we should have nothing to do with them?
  
  No. As I said in the comment you clearly did not read while deciding to dismiss
  
  The reality is that it is almost never one person saying something. And you can EASILY prioritize the other orgs that came to a similar decision. It is more about marketing and less about ideology, but people generally attribute calculus to Newton over anyone else even though it was largely an evolution and codification of existing concepts.
  
  (…)
  
  And if the reality is that it truly did come out of hatred and evil (e.g. a surprisingly small amount of medical research does indeed come out of the atrocities of WW2). You don’t tell someone “Hey, this medicine came from torturing and murdering Romani twins”. You give it to them, maybe think a bit if you are aware, and move on. And any historical discussion provides all the context and uses that context as a thought discussion.
  
  As for your other comment
  
  So tell me. Where is the line? I still think that’s a fairly difficult question, even if you don’t.
  
  Well, in this case I think the line is pretty clear: Don’t give money to nazis. Which is what Framework Corp is doing. This is not a case of choosing to not remove a package run by known hateful bigots from a package manager. It is a case of actively giving money to said bigots.
  
  source