Comment

Comment on A cartoonist's review of AI art, by Matthew Inman

A_norny_mousse@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

I was kinda against their argument at first, then I was with them and continued reading. But then they went into all sorts of detail, weighing pros and cons etc., and after reading more than half I evtl. gave up.

It seems all “why AI is bad” articles seem to go this way.

It seems all “why AI is bad” articles unwillingly even support the hype.

Fuck AI “art”, it’s not art you morons, it’s automation, which takes away real people’s jobs. The current implementations made by greedy companies also very obviously steal. 'nuff said.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Johanno@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
I know that art is an art of it’s own and a way to express human creativity.

However people also complained once the loom was invented. It took lots of jobs.

The job argument is usually a stupid one.

The lack of creativity and quality is of course a much better argument against AI art.

source
- A_norny_mousse@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  
  The job argument is usually a stupid one.
  
  The what? It’s the only one that objectively makes sense.
  
  source
  - Johanno@feddit.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    Ok imagine this:
    
    You are an construction worker. The job is hard but the pay is okay.
    
    Now robots replace your job slowly. They are cheaper and more accurate.
    
    You can now:
    
    Complain about the robots stealing your job
    
    Be happy that you don’t have to do the hard work anymore.
    
    Many people will go for 1. But the actual issue is that the social security net isn’t existent or so weak that no job means no food.
    
    That is not the fault of technology though.
    
    Remember that when you vote and when politicians want to cut costs by reducing payments for the unemployed.
    
    source
    sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    Option 2 is soulless.
    
    Option 3. Destroy the capitalists owned robots and bring the robots under the control of the working class.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
I liked it, personally. I’ve read plenty of AI bad articles, and I too am burnt out on them. However, what I really appreciated about this was that it felt less like a tirade against AI art and more like a love letter to art and the humans that create it. As I was approaching the ending of the comic, for example, when the argument had been made, and the artist was just making their closing words, I was struck by the simple beauty of the art. It was less the shapes and the colours themselves that I found beautiful, but the sense that I could practically feel the artist straining against the pixels in his desperation to make something that he found beautiful — after all, what would be the point if he couldn’t live up to his own argument?

I don’t know how far you got through, but I’d encourage you to consider taking another look at it. It’s not going to make any arguments you’ve not heard before, but if you’re anything like me, you might appreciate it from the angle of a passionate artist striving to make something meaningful in defiance of AI. I always find my spirits bolstered by work like this because whilst we’re not going to be able to draw our way out of this AI-slop hellscape, it does feel important to keep reminding ourselves of what we’re fighting for.

source